...
·····
world

Los Angeles Ordered to Pay $11.8 Million in Police Force Case

By The Daily Nines Editorial StaffApril 18, 20263 Min Read
Los Angeles Ordered to Pay $11.8 Million in Police Force CaseBlack & White

LOS ANGELES — A federal jury has mandated that the City of Los Angeles disburse a substantial sum of $11.8 million to a man who suffered permanent blindness from a police projectile fired during the jubilant 2020 World Series celebrations. The verdict, delivered recently, underscores the escalating scrutiny surrounding law enforcement's use of force in crowd control scenarios and the profound human cost of such incidents.

The incident occurred amidst the widespread public revelry that followed the Los Angeles Dodgers' championship victory. As throngs of fans gathered in the city's streets, law enforcement officers were deployed to manage the crowds. During these operations, a then 27-year-old individual, whose identity has been protected in some reports, was struck by a "less-lethal" projectile, resulting in irreversible ocular damage. The ensuing legal battle spanned several years, culminating in the recent jury decision that has now poised the city for a significant financial outlay.

This ruling bolsters a growing national conversation regarding the deployment of kinetic impact projectiles, often referred to as rubber bullets or beanbag rounds, by police forces. While ostensibly designed to de-escalate situations without resorting to lethal force, their capacity for severe injury, particularly when misused or deployed in dense crowds, has been a mounting concern for civil liberties advocates and medical professionals alike. Historically, cities have grappled with the delicate balance between maintaining public order and safeguarding individual rights, a challenge frequently amplified during large-scale public gatherings. The verdict, as reported by outlets including the Yakima Herald-Republic, serves as a stark reminder of the accountability municipalities bear when police actions lead to grave harm.

The plaintiff's legal team successfully argued that the use of force in this instance was excessive and unwarranted, leading directly to the life-altering injury. During the proceedings, evidence was unveiled detailing the severe impact on the individual’s life, including extensive medical treatments and the profound psychological toll of permanent disability. The awarded sum is intended to compensate for medical expenses, lost earnings, and the immense pain and suffering endured. Such substantial settlements inevitably prompt questions about police training protocols, equipment efficacy, and oversight mechanisms designed to prevent similar tragedies. Critics often point to a pattern of incidents where "non-lethal" munitions have caused severe head injuries, vision loss, and even fatalities, urging a re-evaluation of their deployment guidelines.

For Los Angeles, the verdict represents not only a significant financial burden on public coffers but also a moment for introspection regarding its policing strategies during mass events. The city now faces the imperative to review its crowd management tactics and the training provided to officers, ensuring that public safety is upheld without compromising the well-being of its citizens. This case is poised to resonate beyond Los Angeles, contributing to the wider discourse on police accountability and the responsible application of force across the nation.

Originally reported by Yakima Herald-republic. Read the original article

In-Depth Insight

What history's greatest thinkers would say about this story

John Stuart Mill

John Stuart Mill

Philosopher of Liberty and Utilitarianism · 1806–1873

In this lamentable affair, where a citizen's sight is stolen by the unchecked hand of authority, I am compelled to invoke the principles of my essay On Liberty. The sole justification for interfering with individual freedom is to prevent harm to others, yet here the state's projectile wrought grievous injury amidst mere celebration, a clear excess that subverts the very fabric of utility and justice. Such incidents reveal the peril of paternalistic power, urging society to foster open discourse and protect personal autonomy, lest the greatest happiness for the greatest number be sacrificed to arbitrary force. We must recalibrate institutions to ensure that the liberty of the individual, the cornerstone of progress, remains inviolate against the tides of misguided enforcement.

Edmund Burke

Edmund Burke

Conservative Political Thinker and Statesman · 1729–1797

This verdict, a stark admonition from the annals of justice, echoes my warnings in Reflections on the Revolution in France against the rashness of unbridled authority that disrupts the organic bonds of society. The police's deployment of force in a moment of communal joy strikes me as a dangerous innovation, forsaking the wisdom of tradition and prudent restraint that safeguards civil order. Yet, in holding the city accountable, we glimpse the necessity of gradual reform, balancing the preservation of public peace with the inherited rights of individuals, lest we unravel the delicate tapestry of social harmony through impulsive actions that inflict irreparable harm upon the body politic.

Jeremy Bentham

Jeremy Bentham

Founder of Utilitarianism · 1748–1832

Observing this case, I apply the hedonic calculus to weigh the pleasures and pains: the $11.8 million awarded reflects the profound misery inflicted by a 'less-lethal' weapon, far outweighing any fleeting benefit in crowd control, as per my principles in An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Such force, intended for the greater good, has instead multiplied suffering, exposing a failure in maximizing happiness for the multitude. Society must revise its policies, ensuring that law enforcement adheres to the greatest happiness principle through rigorous oversight, transforming potential harms into instruments of equitable utility and preventing the needless agony that undermines communal welfare.

Aristotle

Aristotle

Ancient Greek Philosopher · 384 BC–322 BC

In this modern tragedy, where a guardian of the polis inflicts blindness upon a citizen in the throes of celebration, I am drawn to my Ethics, which deems justice as the mean between extremes of excess and deficiency. The officers' use of force exemplifies an unjust excess, violating the common good I outlined in the Politics, where the state should promote eudaimonia for all. This verdict serves as a corrective, urging leaders to cultivate virtue and moderation in authority, lest the community devolve into discord. True order arises not from coercive might but from equitable laws that honor the dignity of each member, fostering a harmonious life together.

John Locke

John Locke

Enlightenment Philosopher of Natural Rights · 1632–1704

This incident lays bare the violation of the social contract I expounded in my Two Treatises of Government, where legitimate authority exists solely to protect natural rights to life, liberty, and property, not to assail them with unwarranted force. The permanent harm inflicted by the projectile represents a tyrannical breach, justifying the recourse to law and redress as a check on arbitrary power. Governments, derived from the consent of the governed, must be held accountable to prevent such abuses, ensuring that the protection of individual rights underpins societal order. In reflecting on this, I see the imperative for reforms that reaffirm the foundations of civil society, guarding against the erosion of freedoms that sustain a just commonwealth.